Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.865/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs R.S. Siddique regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-28
Duration
approximately-4 years 9 months
Case Code No.
865
Case Closed
Mon, 07/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is the plaintiff, represented by its Manager. The case involves the defendant, R.S. Siddique, who failed to repay a loan amount due to the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding loan amount and decreed in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹6,47,167/- with 6% interest from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding loan amount and decreed in favor of the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan and the defendant's failure to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan and the defendant's failure to repay.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of 6,47,167₹/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Forty-Seven Thousand One Hundred and Sixty-Seven only) is due from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of 6,47,167₹/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Forty-Seven Thousand One Hundred and Sixty-Seven only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R.S. Siddique
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application, Request for Overdraft facilities, Original Sanction Letter, Original agreement cum Deed of Hypothecation, Original guarantee agreement, Original Guarantee Covering Letter, Original Pronote, Certified copy of the statement of accounts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Praveen.C.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mohammed Ashiq R.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of 6,47,167 ₹/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Forty-Seven Thousand One Hundred and Sixty-Seven only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the defendant's application for a loan from the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the loan agreement established between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the sanctioning of the loan amount to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the security interest created by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original Guarantee agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acts as a guarantee for the loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Guarantee Covering Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supplementary document supporting the guarantee for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formalizes the acknowledgment of the loan repayment obligation.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified Copy of the Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the transaction history of the loan and the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Certified Copy of the Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further provides details on the outstanding balance owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 10/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won