Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.119/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs Nanma medicals regarding Suit for realization of money.

Court
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-21
Duration
approximately-7 years 8 months
Case Code No.
119
Case Closed
Fri, 03/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendant, Nanma medicals, which has defaulted on repayment. The case was finalized with the defendants failing to appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The suit was decreed with costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.3,28,862.69 with interest at the rate of 10.90% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The suit was decreed with costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged and proved their case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged and proved their case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence prove its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.3,28,862.69/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10.90% per annum from 08.01.2023 till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jyothis Mohan
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nanma medicals
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hemamalini
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application dated 15.07.2017, Cash Credit Agreement dated 15.07.2017, Draft Restructuring Agreement dated 20.01.2020, Copy of Statement of Account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Pradeep.P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Renu.G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover the loan amount due from the defendant.
Evidence:
Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as evidence to support the loan amount claimed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms of the cash credit agreement related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Draft Restructuring Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was presented to show the restructuring of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided the financial statement evidencing the default on the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 07/15/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won