Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1595/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs Muhammed Yasir regarding realisation of money.

Court
Court of Principal Munsiff
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
approximately-1 year 1 month
Case Code No.
1595
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, Muhammed Yasir, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendant failed to appear in court, leading to the case proceeding ex parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, decreeing the amount stated in the suit along with interest and costs. The defendant was found liable for the outstanding loan amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹2,79,211/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization and the costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, decreeing the amount stated in the suit along with interest and costs. The defendant was found liable for the outstanding loan amount.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved its case through oral and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved its case through oral and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 clearly establish that an amount of ₹2,79,211/- is due from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of 2,79,211₹/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Seventy-Nine Thousand Two Hundred and Eleven only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Yasir
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application dated 19/05/2014, Composite Hypothecation Agreement dated 19/05/2014, Acknowledgment of Debt dated 27/01/2020, Acknowledgment of Debt dated 20/09/2022, Bank statement of the loan account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sreena L.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sana J.O
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹2,79,211/- with 6% interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of 2,79,211 ₹/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Seventy-Nine Thousand Two Hundred and Eleven only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application for credit facilities signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Composite Hypothecation Agreement signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of Debt for all types of facilities by the borrower.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of Debt and Security signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the bank statement of the loan account certified in accordance with the Bankers' Books Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 05/19/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won