Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.491/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.Prithvi Upholstery & Furniture Works regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Judge
Smt. Karthika.A.R
Order Date
2025-03-21
Duration
approximately-1 year 5 months
Case Closed
Fri, 03/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against M/s.Prithvi Upholstery & Furniture Works for the recovery of outstanding loan amounts. The defendant failed to appear, leading to a decision in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the total outstanding loan amounts along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.9,17,247/- in respect of the first loan and Rs.37,558/- in respect of the second loan together with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the total outstanding loan amounts along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established its case warranting the grant of relief sought for based on documentation and testimony.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established its case warranting the grant of relief sought for based on documentation and testimony.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontroverted testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A11 documents the plaintiff had established its case warranting the grant of relief sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed with costs. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.9,17,247/- in respect of the first loan and an amount of Rs.37,558/- in respect of the second loan together with interest.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s.Prithvi Upholstery & Furniture Works
Party Age
44
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application Form, Original Cash Credit Agreement, Original Letter of Undertaking, Original request for Overdraft Facilities, Original Pronote, Original Deed of Hypothecation, Original Acknowledgment of Debt and Security, Statement of Account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff seeks to recover outstanding dues from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit decreed with costs Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.9,17,247/- in respect of the first loan and an amount of Rs.37,558/- in respect of the second loan together with interest at the rate of 6% from the date of suit till realisation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Loan Application form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented to show the loan application made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms of the cash credit loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is evidence of the defendant's commitments to the bank regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the claim regarding additional financial facilities requested by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence of the loan obligations accepted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document secures the loans against the assets of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the outstanding debts on different dates, confirming the defendant's liabilities.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Original Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was referred to in the context of the acknowledgment of debt by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Original Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document continues to establish the defendant’s recognition of their debt.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides an account statement detailing the outstanding amounts owed.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the financial claims against the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.Prithvi Upholstery & Furniture Works regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s.Prithvi Upholstery & Furniture Works regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won