Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1685 /2022

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Rasam Restaurant et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration
approximately-8 years 27 days
Case Code No.
1685
Case Closed
Wed, 01/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against M/S Rasam Restaurant and its partners for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests, leading to this legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting the recovery of the outstanding loan amount with interest. The suit was found to be valid based on the evidence presented.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹3,54,990/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit until realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting the recovery of the outstanding loan amount with interest. The suit was found to be valid based on the evidence presented.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient documentary evidence proving the defendants' outstanding liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient documentary evidence proving the defendants' outstanding liability.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹3,54,990/- is due from the defendants. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendants are liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 3,54,990 ₹ /- (Rupees Three Lakhs Fifty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/S Rasam Restaurant
Relation
represented by its partners
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajkumar R.C
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prathibha Ravi. K
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 28/12/2016, Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation dated 31/12/2016, Guarantee agreements and covering letters dated 31/12/2016, Statement of account from 01/12/2016 to 22/09/2022.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover an amount of ₹3,54,990/- with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 3,54,990 ₹ /- (Rupees Three Lakhs Fifty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence of the loan application dated 28/12/2016.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as evidence of the agreement executed on 31/12/2016.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Introduced as part of the documentary evidence dated 31/12/2016.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Guarantee covering letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as a covering letter for the guarantee agreement dated 31/12/2016.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence marked on 31/12/2016.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Guarantee covering letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another covering letter associated with the guarantee agreement dated 31/12/2016.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided a certified account statement from 01/12/2016 to 22/09/2022.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 12/28/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won