Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1061/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Kaashi Fish N Meats regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-07-17
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 07/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit for the realization of outstanding loan amounts from the defendant, M/s Kaashi Fish N Meats, after violating the terms of two loan agreements. The plaintiff contended that substantial amounts were due due to non-repayment of loans taken for business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff bank, ordering the defendant to repay outstanding loan amounts along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,77,404/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum and Rs.2,62,436/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff bank, ordering the defendant to repay outstanding loan amounts along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully established its case with unchallenged evidence and documents proving the loans and outstanding amounts.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully established its case with unchallenged evidence and documents proving the loans and outstanding amounts.
Supporting Evidence
The uncontroverted averments in the plaint and the facts sworn in the affidavit coupled with the accompanying documents go on to prove that the defendant has availed loan facility from the plaintiff Bank and that an amount of Rs.1,77,404/- in respect of the first loan and Rs.2,62,436/- in respect of the second loan are due to the plaintiff bank as on the date of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed with costs: 1. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.1,77,404/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree. 2. Plaintiff is also entitled to realise an amount of Rs.2,62,436/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Kaashi Fish N Meats
Party Age
32
Relation
represented by its proprietor-ArunKumar.H
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application Form, Cash Credits Agreement, Agreement Cum Deed of Hypothecation, Pronote, Take Delivery Letter to DPN, Statement of account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Prasanth. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's entitlement to recover Rs.1,77,404/- with specified interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.1,77,404/- (Rupees One lakh seventy seven thousand four hundred and four only) with interest at the rate of 12 % per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's entitlement to recover Rs.2,62,436/- with specified interest.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise an amount of Rs.2,62,436/- (Rupees Two lakhs sixty two thousand four hundred and thirty six only) with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's entitlement to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as part of the evidence to establish loan sanction.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant, detailing the terms of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the hypothecation terms for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a formal promise to pay the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the delivery of the loan funds.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the outstanding balances on the loans.
Reference:
Ext.A6 and A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Kaashi Fish N Meats regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Kaashi Fish N Meats regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 02/21/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won