Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1228/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Jerald Metals regarding realisation of money.

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-04-03
Duration
approximately-3 years 3 months
Case Closed
Thu, 04/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Manager, suing M/s Jerald Metals for recovery of a loan amount of ₹3,85,652/- plus interest. The defendant did not appear in court, resulting in a judgment against them.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover a total of ₹3,85,652/- from the defendant along with interest and costs. The court found the defendant liable as they failed to appear and contest the claims.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,85,652/- from the defendant and his assets, along with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover a total of ₹3,85,652/- from the defendant along with interest and costs. The court found the defendant liable as they failed to appear and contest the claims.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence that the defendant owed the amount as claimed in the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence that the defendant owed the amount as claimed in the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the defendant was set ex parte and PW1 was not cross-examined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,85,652/- from the defendant and his assets. Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 12.9% per annum with monthly rests from 01/07/2024 till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Jerald Metals
Party Age
42
Relation
represented by its Proprietor- Xavier Jerald
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application dated 06.01.2022, Cash Credit Agreement dated 06.01.2022, Letter of Renewal dated 06.01.2023, Statement of Account from 21/07/2023 to 30/06/2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mansoor.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,85,652/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to realise ₹3,85,652/- with interest at the rate of 12.9% per annum with monthly rests from the date of suit till realisation.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 12.9% per annum from 01/07/2024.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 12.9% per annum with monthly rests from 01/07/2024 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendant as part of the loan request.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the terms of the loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication regarding the renewal of terms related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the amount due to the plaintiff as of the specified date.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Jerald Metals regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Jerald Metals regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 01/06/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 04/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won