Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1432/2019

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Suresh.S regarding realization of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration
approximately-6 years 4 months 14 days
Case Code No.
1432
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Suresh.S for the recovery of a loan amount with interest. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to an ex parte decision.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the loan amount with interest from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹1,00,324/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the loan amount with interest from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence and documents produced by the plaintiff clearly showed the defendant's liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence and documents produced by the plaintiff clearly showed the defendant's liability.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹1,00,324/- is due from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹1,00,324/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Principal Officer, Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh.S
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Deed of Hypothecation, Original Letter of Undertaking, Original Acknowledgment of debt and security, Bank statement of Loan Account, True copy of the notice, Returned registered notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Pothencode V Vinod Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Neeraj C.B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹1,00,324/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹1,00,324/- (Rupees One Lakh Three Hundred and Twenty-Four only), with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the loan agreement and the defendant's obligation.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the defendant's commitment to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledges the debt owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Bank statement of Loan Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the outstanding balance and transaction history.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: True copy of the Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the defendant about the outstanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned Registered Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the defendant evaded the plaintiff's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won