Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.261/2023

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Shamala S regarding realisation of money

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff - I
Judge
Smt. Karthika.A.R
Order Date
2025-03-28
Duration
approximately-10 years 9 months
Case Closed
Fri, 03/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank sanctioned a loan to Shamala S for purchasing a motor car. After multiple defaults in repayment, the bank filed a suit to recover the outstanding amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of Canara Bank, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest from Shamala S.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Canara Bank is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.4,41,211/- along with interest at the rate of 6%.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of Canara Bank, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest from Shamala S.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff bank established its case with uncontroverted testimony and supporting documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff bank established its case with uncontroverted testimony and supporting documents.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontroverted testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A7 documents the plaintiff had established its case warranting the grant of relief sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed with costs. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.4,41,211/- with interest at the rate of 6%.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shamala S
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application Form, Original Deed of Hypothecation, Original Letter of Undertaking re: Loans/Advances, Original Acknowledgment of Debt and Security, Statement of Account, Lawyers Notice and Postal Receipt, Returned Lawyer’s Notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V Vinod Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Chaithanya S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Neeraj C B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Gopalakrishnan V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is liable to decreed with costs. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.4,41,211/- (Rupees Four lakhs forty one thousand two hundred and eleven only) with interest at the rate of 6% from the date of suit till realisation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Loan Application form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence establishing the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document secures the loan and evidences the hypothecation of the vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Letter of Undertaking Re: Loans/Advances
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter outlines the undertakings made by the defendant regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is evidence of the defendant acknowledging the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement provides details of the outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyers Notice and Postal Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is related to the notification sent to the defendant regarding the dues.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Returned Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the communication sent to the defendant regarding the legal action.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Shamala S regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Shamala S regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 06/10/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won