Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1026/2023

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s.G.V.Construction regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri.Manesh .S.V
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-5 years 8 months 29 days
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bank of Baroda bringing a suit against M/s.G.V.Construction for recovery of money owed due to breached loan agreements. The defendants failed to respond or appear in court, leading to an ex parte decision.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the loan amount due with interest. The defendants are held liable for the outstanding dues as they did not contest the claims.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.5,17,763.89/- with interest at the rate of 13% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the loan amount due with interest. The defendants are held liable for the outstanding dues as they did not contest the claims.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established its case through unchallenged testimony and documentation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established its case through unchallenged testimony and documentation.
Supporting Evidence
The uncontroverted averments in the plaint and the facts sworn in the affidavit coupled with the accompanying documents go on to prove that the defendants have availed a loan facility from the plaintiff Bank.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.5,17,763.89/- (Rupees Five lakhs seventeen thousand seven hundred and sixty three and eighty nine paise only) with interest at the rate of 13% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree from the defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s.G.V.Construction
Party Age
73
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhakrishnan Nair .C
Party Age
73
Relation
Proprietor
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application form, loan sanction letter, legal notice, and other relevant financial documents.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sheeba Jaffer Sait
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.5,17,763.89/- (Rupees Five lakhs seventeen thousand seven hundred and sixty three and eighty nine paise only) with interest at the rate of 13% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree from the defendants.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of costs from defendants.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence to support the claim of loan given to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of approval
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides evidence of loan approval for the principal amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the amount sanctioned for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the security provided against the loans.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Declaration Cum Undertaking Cum Authority
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the terms agreed upon by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of Sole-Proprietorship
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the defendant's business ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: D.P Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan amount accepted.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Letter of Continuing Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the ongoing security measures for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Letter of installment with acceleration clause
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Specifies the terms of repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Undertaking Letter from Borrowers
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Affirms the borrower's agreement to the loan conditions.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Letter of installment with acceleration clause
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another instance of repayment arrangement evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Loan cum hypothecation agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further details the agreement terms.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing demand for repayment noticed to defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending legal notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Certified copy of statement of accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the outstanding loan amount and calculations.
Reference:
Ext.A15

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s.G.V.Construction regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s.G.V.Construction regarding recovery of money.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/20/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won