Case Summary
The plaintiff, Asuhar Badarudeen, is seeking an injunction against the defendants, Sajeev.P.S. and Sujitha, regarding access to a pathway. The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing access to the plaintiff's properties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, allowing him to access his properties without obstruction.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case warranting immediate relief.
The plaintiff established a prima facie case warranting immediate relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case warranting immediate relief.
The plaintiff established a prima facie case warranting immediate relief.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from closing down petition D schedule pathway or from creating any obstruction in the petition D schedule pathway for the ingress and egress to the petition A and B schedule properties by the petitioner.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asuhar Badarudeen
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajeev.P.S.
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sujitha
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.S.Satheesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from closing down petition D schedule pathway or from creating any obstruction in the petition D schedule pathway for the ingress and egress to the petition A and B schedule properties.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025