Case Summary
This case involves a petition filed by Arya R.S against multiple defendants including Rajendran @ Unnikannan. The petition seeks an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from disturbing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining defendants from committing waste and disturbing possession of the property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff to protect their rights over the property until a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the necessity to prevent potential harm to the plaintiff's possession of the property.
The court found the necessity to prevent potential harm to the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the respondents/defendants and their associates from committing waste in the plaint schedule property and from disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the petitioner/plaintiff until 17/03/2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Arya R.S
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajendran @ Unnikannan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajith Kumar N.G @ Kunku
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mahesh Kumar
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vineeth Krishnan @ Kannan
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shaju.G
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G. L. Mohanachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. Sunil Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Poonthura Tharif.B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the respondents/defendants and their associates from committing waste in the plaint schedule property and from disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the petitioner/plaintiff until 17/03/2025.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the respondents/defendants and their associates from committing waste in the plaint schedule property and from disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the petitioner/plaintiff until 17/03/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Arya R.S vs Rajendran @ Unnikannan et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Arya R.S vs Rajendran @ Unnikannan et al regarding ad-interim injunction