Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1953/2025

Case between Ambili.V.J vs Jayanthi Kumari.A et al regarding ad-interim injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration
Case Code No.
1953
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ambili.V.J, the plaintiff, is seeking an ad-interim injunction against Jayanthi Kumari.A and Kamal.D, the defendants, to prevent them from interfering with her peaceful possession of the property. The court has granted the injunction until December 15, 2025.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, Ambili.V.J, to prevent the defendants from interfering with her possession of the property until the specified date.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's possession.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, Ambili.V.J, to prevent the defendants from interfering with her possession of the property until the specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court is satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court is satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/counter petitioners and their henchmen from interfering with the peaceful possession of plaintiff in the plaint schedule property until 15/12/2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ambili.V.J
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayanthi Kumari.A
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kamal.D
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Anithas Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Arun Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Aleena Henry
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Niranjana Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Niranjana.A.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Athira
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/counter petitioners and their henchmen from interfering with the peaceful possession of plaintiff in the plaint schedule property until 15/12/2025
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/counter petitioners and their henchmen from interfering with the peaceful possession of plaintiff in the plaint schedule property until 15/12/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jaibheem Ambedkar Charitable Trust represented by Thomas Joseph vs Anil Kumar.S et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Raji vs R.Uma Shankar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between City Plaza Flat Owners Association vs City Plaza Shop Owners Association et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won