Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No.12/24 IN OS.No.1182/2020

Case between Ajith Kumar. B vs Anitha B Kurup @ Anitha Prem Kumar, P. Sreekumar regarding partition and related reliefs.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
approximately-5 years 7 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ajith Kumar. B is the plaintiff seeking a review of a previous order regarding the partition suit he filed. The defendants, Anitha B Kurup and P. Sreekumar, argue that the review petition lacks merit and should be rejected.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected Ajith Kumar. B's review petition due to lack of sufficient grounds. The defendants successfully argued against the petition's merits.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected Ajith Kumar. B's review petition due to lack of sufficient grounds. The defendants successfully argued against the petition's merits.
Key Reasoning:
The court found no apparent errors in the original order warranting a review.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court has not erred in passing order in IA No. 9/2024 dated 30/09/2024. Needless to say, there was no error apparent on the face of the record.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; Petition is rejected. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajith Kumar. B
Relation
S/o Late Bhaskara Kurup and Late Mridula Kumari
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anitha B Kurup @ Anitha Prem Kumar
Relation
D/o late Bhaskara Kurup and Late Mridula Kumari
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Sreekumar
Relation
S/o Late V.R.Parameswaran Nair and Late Sarada Amma
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Ram Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Review petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 and Section 114 of the CPC to review the order dated 30/09/2024 in IA No. 9/2024.
Evidence:
Hence this court is of the view that this petition is only liable to be rejected under Order XLVII Rule 4 (1) CPC and resultantly, I order so.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajith Kumar. B vs Anitha B Kurup @ Anitha Prem Kumar, P. Sreekumar regarding partition and related reliefs.
Case Code Year
Case between Ajith Kumar. B vs Anitha B Kurup @ Anitha Prem Kumar, P. Sreekumar regarding partition and related reliefs.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ajith Kumar.B vs Anitha B Kurup @ Anitha Prem Kumar et al regarding review petition.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between G.S. Chandrasekharan Nair vs Jose.F regarding review of a rejected plaint
Principal Munsiff's Court, Thiruvananthapuram
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Jacob John vs Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd regarding review of execution petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vinod Kumar et al vs Sainudeen regarding review petition
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Syamkumar vs Biju, Sanju regarding review petition for rejection of suit due to non-payment of court fee.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won