Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No.11/24 IN OS.No.1182/2020

Case between Ajith Kumar.B vs Anitha B Kurup @ Anitha Prem Kumar et al regarding review petition.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ajith Kumar.B, the plaintiff, filed a review petition against Anitha B Kurup and P. Sreekumar, the defendants, regarding a prior court order dismissing a petition to reopen evidence in a partition suit. The court ultimately rejected the review petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the review petition as the petitioner did not provide sufficient grounds for review and the earlier order was found to be correct. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the review petition as the petitioner did not provide sufficient grounds for review and the earlier order was found to be correct. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for reviewing the dismissed application.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for reviewing the dismissed application.
Supporting Evidence
The court reasoned that no grounds for review were sufficiently demonstrated and the previous order was not in error.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; Petition is rejected. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajith Kumar.B
Relation
S/o Late Bhaskara Kurup and Late Mridula Kumari
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anitha B Kurup @ Anitha Prem Kumar
Relation
D/o late Bhaskara Kurup and Late Mridula Kumari
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Sreekumar
Relation
S/o Late V.R.Parameswaran Nair and Late Sarada Amma Sabarigiri
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.A.Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.R.Ram Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Review petition for reopening evidence and admitting new documents.
Evidence:
Hence, this court is of the view that this petition is only liable to be rejected under Order XLVII Rule 4 (1) CPC and resultantly, I order so.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajith Kumar.B vs Anitha B Kurup @ Anitha Prem Kumar et al regarding review petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Ajith Kumar.B vs Anitha B Kurup @ Anitha Prem Kumar et al regarding review petition.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 10/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ajith Kumar. B vs Anitha B Kurup @ Anitha Prem Kumar regarding review of dismissal of application for document production
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between G.S. Chandrasekharan Nair vs Jose.F regarding review of a rejected plaint
Principal Munsiff's Court, Thiruvananthapuram
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Jacob John vs Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd regarding review of execution petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vinod Kumar et al vs Sainudeen regarding review petition
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Syamkumar vs Biju, Sanju regarding review petition for rejection of suit due to non-payment of court fee.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won