Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Abhilash.R., Rajmohan, and Anil Kumar.P., are seeking an injunction against the defendant, Cini Varghese, to prevent her from interfering with their business operations. The court considered the petitioners' case and decided to grant a temporary injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiffs' business.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the petitioners to safeguard their business operations from the defendant's interference. The injunction will remain in place until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case requiring immediate protection.
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case requiring immediate protection.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case requiring immediate protection.
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case requiring immediate protection.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioners/plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case and that the object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/ defendant and her henchmen from interfering with the peaceful conduct of business by the petitioners.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abhilash.R.
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajmohan
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anil Kumar.P.
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Cini Varghese
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ajun Krishna.U.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/ defendant and her henchmen from interfering with the peaceful conduct of business by the petitioners.
Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/ defendant and her henchmen from interfering with the peaceful conduct of business by the petitioners in the petition them form the petition schedule shop room by preventing basic amenities or from evicting them from the petition schedule shop rooms by force otherwise on process of law until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025