Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 198/2012

Case between Abe Abraham et al vs Mammen Thomas et al regarding non prosecution of the suit.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-10-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include Abe Abraham, Rani.S, Raju Oommen, and K.R. Cleatus, while the defendants include Mammen Thomas and others. The case involves a dismissal for non prosecution due to the plaintiffs' absence despite notice.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for non prosecution as the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing. Despite notices being issued, the plaintiffs did not appear in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for non prosecution as the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing. Despite notices being issued, the plaintiffs did not appear in court.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to appear for the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to appear for the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not appeared despite issuance of notice.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abe Abraham
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o A.A. Abraham
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rani. S
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o Jayachandran.V
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raju Oommen
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o K. N Oommen
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.R. Cleatus
Relation
S/o Joseph Richar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mammen Thomas
Relation
S/o Late P.M. Thomas
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kurian Eapen Thomas
Relation
S/o Late P.M. Thomas
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saramma Abraham
Relation
W/o Abraham Koshi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thomas Thomas
Relation
S/o P.M. Thomas
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Vicar, Marthoma, St. Thomas Church
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G. Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.K. Vijayan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vincent D Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. Thomas .A. John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abdul Karim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jacob Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Government Pleader
Law Firm
Additional Govt. Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abe Abraham et al vs Mammen Thomas et al regarding non prosecution of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Abe Abraham et al vs Mammen Thomas et al regarding non prosecution of the suit.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Application in Pauper Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won