| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3886 - 3890 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ajanthakumar vs Archana, K.Indira regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1458/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-09-24

approximately-8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suresh Kumar vs Moli Bindhu @ Kunjumol regarding dismissal of suit.

Civil Suit

OS. No.1475/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-09-24

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kiran Kumar.K.S vs Ajayaghosh.A regarding plaint rejection

Civil Suit

OS. No.1853/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-09-26

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Leela Martin et al regarding dismissal for default

Civil Suit

OS. No.515/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-09-25

approximately-2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between T.S. Jayaprakash vs M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1563/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-09-26

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to automatic dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many petitions were dismissed due to insufficient evidence regarding the respondents' financial capacity or related facts.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices or producing documents, leading to defaults.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Several cases were dismissed because the petitioners failed to appear at court hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?