Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.515/2023

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Leela Martin et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-09-25
Duration
approximately-2 years
Case Closed
Thu, 09/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bank of Baroda as the plaintiff and Leela Martin and others as defendants. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of necessary publications and steps to summon the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to inadequate steps taken by the plaintiff to notify the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to inadequate steps taken by the plaintiff to notify the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Proper steps were not taken by the plaintiff to summon the defendants.
Why Defendant Won:
Proper steps were not taken by the plaintiff to summon the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
No proper steps seen taken to issue summons to the defendant till date even though the suit was filed in the year 2023.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leela Martin
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudarshana Martin
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashik Martin
Party Age
22
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
No paper publication seen produced.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. T.J. Shakeela Beegum
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to lack of proper steps taken to issue summons to the defendant.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Leela Martin et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Leela Martin et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 09/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won