Case Summary
The case involves Kiran Kumar.K.S as the plaintiff and Ajayaghosh.A as the defendant. The court delivered a judgment rejecting the plaint due to lack of balance court fee and absence of a memo.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected by the court due to the failure to remit the balance court fee and the absence of a memo.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to procedural deficiencies.
The plaint was rejected due to procedural deficiencies.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to procedural deficiencies.
The plaint was rejected due to procedural deficiencies.
Supporting Evidence
Both sides represented. No Balance court fee remitted and no memo seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected Under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kiran Kumar.K.S
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajayaghosh.A
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N.Krishna Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.Sajeesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for not remitting balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected Under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kiran Kumar.K.S vs Ajayaghosh.A regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Kiran Kumar.K.S vs Ajayaghosh.A regarding plaint rejection