Private Company

The case involves M/s Indo Quartz as the plaintiff and M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and others as defendants. The plaintiff filed a petition under Order 38 Rule 5, claiming that the defendants intended to withdraw funds to defeat a potential decree against them.

Plaintiff Jayakrishnan filed a suit against a private company and its directors seeking the recovery of Rs.2,00,000 lent to develop their jewellery business, with the court decreeing in favor of the plaintiff.

Plaintiff filed suit against defendants for the realization of Rs. 1,30,000 representing 50 grams of gold taken as an investment in the jewelry business.

Veluthedath Parambil Fathima, represented by her power of attorney holder, filed a petition seeking permission to sue as a pauper against Accomplish Marketing Company and others. The petitioner loaned Rs.3,50,000 to the defendants for business expansion but they failed to repay.

Krishnankutty filed a suit against Accomplish Marketing Company Ltd to recover Rs. 50,000 lent for business expansion, alleging non-payment of profit share and misuse of funds by the defendant.

Two petitioners, Abdul Latheef and Abdul Hameed, filed a rent control petition against Indus Motors Company seeking relief under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Petitioners seek eviction of the respondent from the rented premises as they require the space for starting a new office for their company.