Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No. 6 OF 2017

Case between Veluthedath Parambil Fathima vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding loan repayment dispute

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B.
Order Date
2018-01-22
Duration
Less than a year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Veluthedath Parambil Fathima, represented by her power of attorney holder, filed a petition seeking permission to sue as a pauper against Accomplish Marketing Company and others. The petitioner loaned Rs.3,50,000 to the defendants for business expansion but they failed to repay.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, granting permission to the petitioner to sue as a pauper for recovery of the loan amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to sue as a pauper for recovery of loan amount
Case Type
Civil Suit - Recovery of Loan
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioner had no other means to pay the court fee and was entitled to sue as a pauper.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Veluthedath Parambil Fathima (66 years) Veluthedath Parambil House, Kallingal amsom Kalpakanchery desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd. (Age not specified years) Pariyapuram, Mukkola, Parappanangadi Road, Tanur Thattarambath Prasad (Age not specified years) Thattarambath House, Pattaruparam, Thanalur, Tirur Taluk Gopalakrishnan (55 years) 8/201 Mankulangara Variyam, Ramapuram.P.O., Perinthalmanna Taluk Shuju (Age not specified years) Kurungattil Vadakkethil House, Pattaruparambu, Niramaruthoor.P.O., Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission to sue as a pauper for recovery of loan amount
Evidence:
In the result the petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement for loan payment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of loan agreement between petitioner and defendants.
Reference:
Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submission made by petitioner regarding financial circumstances and inability to pay court fee.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Company

Similar Cases