Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.34 OF 2016

Case between Abdul Latheef et al vs Indus Motors Company, Private Ltd regarding eviction for office space necessity

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2016-09-24
Duration
Not mentioned
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners seek eviction of the respondent from the rented premises as they require the space for starting a new office for their company.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the petitioners' request for eviction based on their genuine need for the premises for starting a new office.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction order with three months to vacate
Case Type
Eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioners demonstrated a genuine need for the premises to start their company's office, and respondent failed to challenge the claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result petition is allowed as follows: The respondent is hereby directed to give vacant possession of the shop rooms to the petitioners within three months from the date of this order under 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Latheef (65 years) Kayalmadhathil House, Keezhedathu Road, Naduvilangadi, Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur. Tirur amsom, Poorur desom Abdul Hameed (63 years) Same as Abdul Latheef

Defendants

Indus Motors Company, Private Ltd (Not mentioned years) M.G. Road, Thevara, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction order with three months to vacate
Evidence:
The respondent is hereby directed to give vacant possession of the shop rooms to the petitioners within three months from the date of this order under 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved demand for vacant possession
Reference:
A1: 06-03-2015
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmation of communication
Reference:
A2: 07-03-2015
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of notice receipt
Reference:
A3: 07-03-2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 09/24/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Company

Similar Cases