Similar Cases
Based on: Original Suit No. 107/2025 — Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT No.175/2018
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, are seeking a declaration regarding their life interest in a property previously settled to their son, the second defendant. They claim that a loan taken by the second defendant against the property was unauthorized as their consent was not obtained.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.744/2023
Case between Anil. E. P vs Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Anil. E. P is the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council, the defendant. The plaintiff claims to be in possession of a property he leased and accuses the defendant of attempting to evict him unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 326/2017
Case between Sasilal P vs Vinod K et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Sasilal P, is seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Vinod K and Kadalundi Gramapanchayath, for allegedly encroaching upon his property and constructing a compound wall. The defendants deny the allegations and assert that the road in question is public property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit Nos. 353/2024
Case between Shibu vs R. Rajagopalakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Shibu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against R. Rajagopalakrishnan and others. The case arises from a dispute over property ownership and related claims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 138/2022
Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
The case involves M.R. Gopinadhan Nair as the plaintiff, who is asking for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Perumbavoor Municipality and others regarding unauthorized constructions. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have violated building rules and encroached on his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1549/2019
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sasi and Soumini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chokli, who attempted to obstruct their access to a pathway critical for their property. The case was brought due to concerns over the defendant's attempts to encroach on the pathway, impacting the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 76/2025
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 436 of 2022
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
K.J Thomas and others are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saumya Maju and others. The case concerns excavation activities by the defendants that threaten the plaintiffs' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 545/2024
Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Soni Francis and Lizzy Francis, claim their right to an exclusive car parking facility in a property owned by them in Pioneer Towers. They have been denied this right by the defendants, who are involved in managing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.972/2025
Case between Dr. Yamuna Prasad vs PRS Krishna Apartment and Commercial Space Owners Welfare Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Dr. Yamuna Prasad and Dr. Asha Prasad, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, the PRS Krishna Apartment and its Secretary, Sajith S. Pillai. The case involves a dispute over the operation of a clinic by the plaintiffs and the defendants' attempts to remove signage related to the clinic.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No. 315/2025
Case between Sharafudheen vs Nujumudheen regarding temporary injunction
The petitioner Sharafudheen is seeking a temporary injunction against his brother Nujumudheen to prevent him from encroaching on his property. The dispute arises over a pathway and allegations of unauthorized cutting of a new pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 461/2023
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Chicago Constructions International Private Limited et al regarding temporary injunction for unauthorized construction
Suresh Kumar filed a petition against Chicago Constructions International Private Limited and its Managing Director S. Mohanakumar, seeking a temporary injunction to prevent further construction on a property and to remove an unauthorized construction. The case revolves around issues of property possession and encroachment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 345/2016
Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thottathil Pachukutty et al, claim ownership over a property from which the defendant, Thottathil Sulochana, allegedly encroached and constructed a house illegally. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and title.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.453/2022
Case between Hathikka KV vs Nisha regarding mandatory injunction and compensation.
Hathikka KV, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nisha, the defendant, seeking a mandatory injunction to vacate the property used for unauthorized occupation and compensation for damages. The plaintiff claims the defendant has overstayed the agreement terms, and the property is needed for a medical shop.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 756/2024
Case between Fathima Minha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
Fathima Minha.K, represented by her father Ashraf.K, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 398/2021
Case between Sajeesh.P vs Abdul Salam et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
Sajeesh.P is the plaintiff and Abdul Salam along with the Secretary, Kozhikode Corporation are the defendants. The plaintiff's counsel did not press the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.361/2021
Case between Secretary E.C. Muhammed vs Kakuzhiyil Pathumma et al regarding Civil Procedure Code Section 26 Order VII R Caram
The plaintiff, Secretary E.C. Muhammed, has filed a suit against multiple defendants, including Kakuzhiyil Pathumma and others. The case concerns a legal matter under the Civil Procedure Code.
Civil Suit
Original Suit Nos. 564/2016
Case between P.M.Viswanathan vs Mandattil Geetha regarding damages.
The case involves P.M.Viswanathan and Mandattil Geetha, where the plaintiff seeks damages due to losses incurred from a fire that destroyed business premises. The suit also addresses the defendant's negligence in maintaining safety during operations.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.742/2024
Case between Sreenadhitha.S.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding not pressed suit
Sreenadhitha.S.K, a minor, represented by his father Suresh Kumar.R, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The plaintiff's counsel stated that the suit is not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.730/2024
Case between Sree Nandhitha.S.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code
Sree Nandhitha.S.K, a minor represented by her father, Suresh Kumar.R, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.737/2024
Case between Ridhu Nandhana.S vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit
Ridhu Nandhana.S, a minor represented by her mother Vrinda.C.V, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 230/2021
Case between Rajalakshmi.K et al vs Savithri Amma regarding realisation of amount
The plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of Premarajan Nair, are seeking their share of a fixed deposit amount after the defendant, the nominee, withdrew it without distributing the share. The suit arises from the defendants' refusal to pay the plaintiffs their entitled amount from the fixed deposit left by the deceased Madhavi Amma.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.529/2024
Case between Sri.Ravi Nair vs Anugraha Trading Corporation et al regarding dismissal of suit
Sri.Ravi Nair filed a suit against Anugraha Trading Corporation and its Managing Partner Basheer. The case was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 340/2021
Case between M/s.Anjaneya Financiers vs Jithesh.V.K regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, M/s.Anjaneya Financiers, claims the defendant borrowed Rs.50,000/- and did not repay it as agreed. The defendant claims he has already settled the amount in a prior transaction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 160/2021
Case between Kallinpurath Sunni Publishing Society vs Safi.K et al regarding suit for consideration
The case involves Kallinpurath Sunni Publishing Society as the plaintiff and multiple defendants including Safi.K and others. It is about a preliminary issue found against the plaintiff and the plaint being returned for presenting before the proper Court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 648/2024
Case between Mueenudheen.P.P et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction
The case involves a minor, Mueenudheen.P.P, represented by his father, seeking a mandatory injunction to allow participation in the District Kalolsavam. The defendants include the State of Kerala represented by the District Collector and other officials.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 644/2024
Case between Vyga.K. Vipin vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction
Vyga.K. Vipin, a minor represented by his father, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants for a mandatory injunction. The case concerns the plaintiff's right to participate in the District Kalolsavam.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 641/2024
Case between Sneha Sebastian vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Sneha Sebastian, represented by her mother Biji K. Thomas, filed a suit for mandatory injunction. The defendants, including the State of Kerala and the District Educational Officer, were to permit her participation in the District Kalolsavam.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 642/2024
Case between Thanmaya(minor) vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction
Thanmaya, a minor represented by her mother Jasna K, filed this suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants seeking permission to participate in the District Kalolsavam. The event already occurred, rendering the suit infructuous.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 634/2024
Case between Dellora Raichal et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, represented by a guardian, seeks permission to participate in the District Kalolsavam. The defendants were served with summons but did not appear.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 635/2024
Case between Parvathy Saji(minor) vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction for participation in District Kalolsavam.
The case involves Parvathy Saji, a minor represented by her father, against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction to participate in the District Kalolsavam, which had already occurred.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 630/2024
Case between Malaigha Sabu vs State of Kerala et al regarding a mandatory injunction
Malaigha Sabu, a minor represented by her mother Tintu C John, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other parties for a mandatory injunction to participate in the District Kalolsavam. The court dismissed the suit as infructuous since the event had already occurred.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 627/2024
Case between Adi Sankeerthana vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Adi Sankeerthana, represented by her mother Amrutha, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and two other defendants. The case concerned the plaintiff's right to participate in the District Kalolsavam.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.464/2022
Case between Vodafone Idea Ltd vs Malabar Creations Pvt Ltd regarding a civil suit
Vodafone Idea Ltd filed a suit against Malabar Creations Pvt Ltd. The matter was settled in mediation and the suit was decreed accordingly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 572 /2012
Case between E.S. Santhadevi et al vs Sarada et al regarding recovery of possession and declaration of property rights
E.S. Santhadevi and E.S. Maheshkumar, the plaintiffs, are seeking recovery of possession of property from the defendants, who include Sarada and others. The case revolves around property rights and alleged trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.610/2022
Case between Ace Finlease Pvt.Ltd. vs Harshad.M.H et al regarding realisation of money.
Ace Finlease Pvt.Ltd. filed a suit against Harshad.M.H and Ayishabi for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants defaulted on their repayments as per the loan agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 29/2025
Case between Ragatmika.S vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit not pressed
The plaintiff, Ragatmika.S, a minor, was represented by her father in this suit. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel decided not to pursue it further.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.711/2022
Case between Ace Finlease Pvt.Ltd. vs Sakariya.M et al regarding realisation of money
This suit involves Ace Finlease Pvt.Ltd. seeking payment from defendants Sakariya.M and Raseena.P.K for a loan agreement. The defendants defaulted on the repayment terms set in the personal loan agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.774/2023
Case between Markazzu sakafathu sunniyya et al vs Soji Abraham regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Markazzu sakafathu sunniyya, represented by General Manager C Muhammed Faisi, filed a suit against the defendant Soji Abraham for failing to pay licence fees for usage of the plaint schedule premises. The plaintiff claims the defendant is a trespasser after the licence agreement expired.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.565/2024
Case between Moidu’s Medicare Private Limited vs M/s. Air India Limited et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Moidu’s Medicare Private Limited, is seeking payment for services rendered to the defendants, which include M/s. Air India Limited. The suit arises from unpaid medical treatment claims during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 261/1999
Case between T.N. Devaki vs Padmanabhan Nair et al regarding setting aside the partition deed
The plaintiff, T.N. Devaki, seeks to set aside the partition deed claiming fraud and undue influence exerted by the defendants, who are her relatives. The case revolves around the legitimacy of the shares allotted to her in a disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.784/2024
Case between Sayana Krishna vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit not pressed.
Sayana Krishna, a minor represented by her guardian Baby Udayaraj, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 03/2025
Case between Vijay.K(minor) vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction to permit participation in State Kalolsavam
The case involves Vijay.K, a minor represented by his guardian, K. Babu Rajan, seeking permission to participate in the State Kalolsavam conducted on 04-01-2025. The suit became infructuous as the event had already taken place.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 02/2025
Case between Sreelakshmi(minor) vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction for participation in State Kalolsavam.
Sreelakshmi, a minor represented by her mother Dhanya, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others seeking a mandatory injunction to participate in the State Kalolsavam. The court found that the event had already occurred, rendering the case infructuous.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 347/2021
Case between M/s. Calicut Drug Lines vs Variety Medicals et al regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Calicut Drug Lines, a partnership firm, is seeking to recover an amount due from the defendants for goods supplied on credit. The defendants failed to pay despite repeated demands.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.498/2005
Case between Mekkazhi Moothedath Balan et al vs Mekkazhi Moothedath Chanthu et al regarding a civil suit withdrawn
The plaintiffs include Mekkazhi Moothedath Balan (deceased), Mekkazhi Moothedath Bhargavi, Swaroop Raj, and Swaraj. The case was about a civil suit which has been dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the plaintiffs to file a fresh suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 587/2023
Case between Ace Finlease Private Limited vs Shaiju.K et al regarding settlement of suit.
Ace Finlease Private Limited is the plaintiff represented by its Power of attorney holder M.K. Rajesh. The defendants are Shaiju.K and Subhashini.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won