Case Summary
The plaintiff, M/s.Anjaneya Financiers, claims the defendant borrowed Rs.50,000/- and did not repay it as agreed. The defendant claims he has already settled the amount in a prior transaction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.53,333/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.53,333/- along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant borrowed money, executed a promissory note, and failed to repay.
The plaintiff proved that the defendant borrowed money, executed a promissory note, and failed to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant borrowed money, executed a promissory note, and failed to repay.
The plaintiff proved that the defendant borrowed money, executed a promissory note, and failed to repay.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff had succeeded in proving his case. The defendant had failed to show that he had discharged the entire liability due towards the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.53,333/- (Rupees fifty three thousand three hundred and thirty three only) with future interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiff.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s.Anjaneya Financiers
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jithesh.V.K
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory note, cash receipt, lawyer notice, postal receipt, postal acknowledgment, account statement.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Saviour George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.G.Sreejith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the amount owed to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.53,333/- with future interest.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of License
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of the plaintiff's business registration.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Receipt for Registration renewal e-payment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Validates the renewal of the plaintiff's business license.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type:
Promissory Note
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the defendant's obligation to repay the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Cash Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the receipt of money by the plaintiff from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the demand for repayment made to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of sending the lawyer notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Postal Acknowledgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the lawyer notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Account Statement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the financial transactions related to the loan and interest accrued.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s.Anjaneya Financiers vs Jithesh.V.K regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s.Anjaneya Financiers vs Jithesh.V.K regarding realisation of money.