| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13361 - 13365 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Krishnan.K et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.414 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-06-27

2 years 4 months 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Cholakkal Pathumma Umma et al vs Erukattil Narayanan et al regarding boundary fixation

Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 115 OF 2005

Tirur

2017-06-20

11 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Reshma.P. et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration

Civil Suit - Declaration

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.32 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-06-30

Unknown

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Suresh vs Balan regarding partition and separate allotment of share

Partition Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 104 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-06-30

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shamsath Beegam vs Anwar Sadath et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

Original Suit No. 145 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-06-30

2 years 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the necessary batta for processing their petitions, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to establish financial capability or legal grounds resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs did not take necessary steps to issue notices to defendants, contributing to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of the petitioners during court proceedings.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?