| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13341 - 13345 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Shihab vs Abdul Gafoor regarding cheque dishonour

Cheque Dishonour - N.I. Act

S.T. No:49/2016

Tirur

2017-07-14

1 year less duration of original complaint

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Ramesan et al regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 166/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-13

2 years, 0 months, 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed vs Pachu et al regarding petition dismissal

Civil Suit

EP 269/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-13

2 years, 7 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Karappan et al regarding default in remitting batta

Civil Suit - Default in Remitting Batta

EP 225/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-13

0 years, 8 months, 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Riyas.K regarding realization of amount

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 11 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-07-11

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Required Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the necessary batta, resulting in case dismissal for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Frequent absences of plaintiffs led to dismissals, particularly when lack of representation was noted.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Required Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?