Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 115 OF 2005

Case between Cholakkal Pathumma Umma et al vs Erukattil Narayanan et al regarding boundary fixation

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-06-20
Duration
11 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs filed suit for fixing the boundary between their property's eastern portion and defendants' property. Plaintiff later sought permission to withdraw the suit with intent to file a fresh suit due to some defects in the case.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was allowed to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit regarding the boundary fixation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds for permitting the plaintiff to withdraw the suit and institute a fresh suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute fresh suit in respect of the subject matter of this suit

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Cholakkal Pathumma Umma (Age not specified years) Vettom amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Ayishummu (54 years) Vettom amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Erukattil Narayanan (55 years) Vettom amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Krishnan (47 years) Vettom amsom desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Fresh Suit Permission
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit
Evidence:
Here I am satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for allowing the plaintiff to institute a fresh suit for the subject matter of the suit or part of a claim.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases