| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12736 - 12740 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between U.A.E Exchange and Financial Service Ltd. vs Fathima regarding dishonour of negotiable instrument

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

S.T. No:122/2017

Tirur

2018-01-23

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between U.A.E Exchange and FinancialService Ltd et al vs Ameera.K et al regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:127/2017

Tirur

2018-01-23

More than 1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between U.A.E Exchange and FinancialService Ltd et al vs Jaseera Banau et al regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:128/2017

Tirur

2018-01-23

2 years approximately

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Veluthedath Parambil Fathima vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding loan repayment dispute

Civil Suit - Recovery of Loan

ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No. 6 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-01-22

Less than a year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hamsa vs Ali et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 311 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-01-22

1 year 9 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees (batta), leading to automatic dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take the required steps to issue notices to respondents.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed when the plaintiff failed to appear in court for scheduled hearings.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Issue Notice

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?