| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12716 - 12720 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Pathumma vs Muhammed Shafi et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 341 OF 20 16

Tirur

2018-01-30

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Puthampalli Jayan regarding debt recovery

Execution Petition - Debt Recovery

EP 32/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-30

0 years, 11 months, 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vilissery Hamsa vs Moothamparambil Nadesh et al regarding default in depositing Batta

Execution Petition

EP 151/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-30

0 years, 7 months, 2 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Hussain. T.K @ Hassan regarding execution of debt payment

Execution of Decree by Arrest and Detention

EXECUTION PETITION NO. 167 OF 2017 IN OS 127 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-01-30

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Nazer et al regarding execution of a money decree

Execution - Civil Procedure

EXECUTION PETITION NO. 168 OF 2017 IN OS 125 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-01-30

Approximately 1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to pay required batta, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take required procedural steps, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioners

Cases were often dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?