| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12706 - 12710 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Parappurath Muhammed vs Prabu regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 210 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-02-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kalathilparambil Muhammed's children et al vs Subaida regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 363 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-02-01

3 years approx

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Muhammed Haneefa Neduvancheri regarding default petition

Civil Suit - Default Petition

EP 69/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-02-01

0 years, 10 months, 29 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Samsudeen Poniyeri regarding debt satisfaction

Civil Suit - Debt Satisfaction

EP 46/2017

Malappuram

2018-02-01

0 years, 11 months, 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Niramarathur Co-operative Bank et al vs Kaaliyadan Ummar et al regarding full amount received

Execution Proceeding

EP 181/2017

Tirur,Malappuram

2018-02-01

0 years, 5 months, 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to pay required batta, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take required procedural steps, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioners

Cases were often dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?