| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12756 - 12760 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secratary Perumanna Klalri Service Sahkaran Bank No.F.770 vs Aboobaker,mathapulakkal regarding default enquiry

Civil Suit

EP 110/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-18

0 years, 9 months, 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Fathima Beevi et al vs Kunhan Bava et al regarding way setting and injunction

Civil Suit - Setting out way and Injunction

Original Suit No. 172 OF 2015

Tirur Taluk

2018-01-17

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary Perumanna Klari Service Sahkarna Bank No.F.770 vs Muhammad regarding default judgment

Default Judgment

EP 111/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-17

0 years, 9 months, 5 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M.Raju vs Muhammed @ muhammedali regarding Default Dismissal

Execution Petition

EP 161/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-17

1 year, 7 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Valliyengal Subaida vs Kottathara Nalakath Ahammad Shareef regarding property delivery

Civil Suit - Execution Petition

EP 254/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-17

0 years, 1 months, 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs consistently failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to pay required fees for processing.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were often dismissed because the plaintiff did not appear in court.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Necessary Steps Taken

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take necessary procedural steps, leading to dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Necessary Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?