Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.783/2024

Case between Veena Raj vs Rajeev.S.R regarding realisation of money.

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-03-11
Duration
approximately-1 year 10 months
Case Closed
Tue, 03/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Veena Raj is seeking repayment of a loan amounting to Rs.50,000 from Rajeev.S.R. The loan was taken for personal needs, and despite promises to repay, the defendant failed to do so.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to a sum of Rs.58,500 along with future interest. The defendant is ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.58,500 with future interest at the rate of 12% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to a sum of Rs.58,500 along with future interest. The defendant is ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the borrowed amount through evidence and the defendant did not present any contra evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the borrowed amount through evidence and the defendant did not present any contra evidence.
Supporting Evidence
There is no reason to disbelieve PW1 and there is no contra evidence on record. After considering the oral and documentary evidence from the side of the plaintiff, it is proved that plaintiff is entitled for the borrowed amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 58,500 with future interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Veena Raj
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeev.S.R
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original cheque bearing No. 387777 dated 27/02/2024, Copy of Petition filed by the Plaintiff before the SHO, Vattiyoorkavu dated 08/03/2024, Copy of Acknowledgment receipt dated 11/03/2024, Original of reply from Public Information Officer dated 20/04/2024, Cheque dishonour memo dated 05/04/2024, Copy of Advocate Notice dated 23/04/2024, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Renjith C. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Preethi Mani.T.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs.58,500 including interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 58,500/- with future interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is ordered to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the defendant to the plaintiff for the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the petition filed by the plaintiff before the Police Station regarding the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Acknowledgment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the receipt of the petition filed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original of Reply from Public Information Officer
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a response from the Public Information Officer regarding the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Cheque Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo provides the details of the dishonour of the cheque issued by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant to inform about the dishonour of the cheque and demand payment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card serves as proof of receipt of the notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Veena Raj vs Rajeev.S.R regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Veena Raj vs Rajeev.S.R regarding realisation of money.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 05/23/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 03/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K. Shakeela vs S. Sajan regarding recovery of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.Madhusoodanan vs Smt.S.Chandrika Devi regarding recovery of money
Additional Munsiff-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdul Latheef vs A.N. Naushad et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shajikumar.B vs Sreekumar regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Sreekantan Nair vs R.Rekha @ Rekha Satheesan et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won