Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.426/2020

Case between K.Madhusoodanan vs Smt.S.Chandrika Devi regarding recovery of money

Court
Additional Munsiff-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh S.V
Order Date
2025-09-23
Duration
approximately-6 years 8 months 16 days
Case Closed
Tue, 09/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff K.Madhusoodanan is seeking to recover a loan of Rs.3,00,000/- from the defendant Smt.S.Chandrika Devi. The defendant borrowed the amount for her daughter's education but has not repaid it despite multiple demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partly decreed the suit, allowing K.Madhusoodanan to recover an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partly decreed the suit, allowing K.Madhusoodanan to recover an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant failed to provide credible evidence to rebut the presumption of liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has proved the case by the oral and documentary evidence adduced. The execution of Exts.A1 to A3 was clearly admitted in the written statement which was confirmed in the cross-examination.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is partly decreed with costs as follows: 1. The Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree from the defendant and her assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Madhusoodanan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt.S.Chandrika Devi
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original cheque bearing No.000055, Original cheque bearing No.000054, Original cheque bearing No.000049, Cheque dishonour memo, Copy of Advocate Notice
Defendants Documents
Attested copy of MBBS Certificate issued by SICHUAN University, China, Attested Copy of Certificate of Graduation issued by SICHUAN University.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. R.Girija Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.N.Kuttappan Thazhassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover an amount of Rs.3,03,600/- with interest.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three lakhs only) together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of costs from the defendant.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant and her assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the defendant to discharge the debt owed to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the defendant to discharge the debt owed to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the defendant to discharge the debt owed to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cheque Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo indicates that the cheques were dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent by the plaintiff to the defendant requesting repayment of the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card serves as proof of receipt of the advocate notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Attested copy of MBBS Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document was submitted by the defendant to support her claim regarding her daughter's education.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Attested Copy of Certificate of Graduation
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document was submitted by the defendant to support her claim regarding her daughter's education.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between K.Madhusoodanan vs Smt.S.Chandrika Devi regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between K.Madhusoodanan vs Smt.S.Chandrika Devi regarding recovery of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 09/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Mohammed Yousuf vs Fakrudeen Bava regarding realization of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between C.M.Iype et al vs C.M.Jacob regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajan.M vs M/s.Thanima Marbles et al regarding recovery of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Nazar Abdul et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Remya.S et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won