Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No 383/2018

Case between Rajan.M vs M/s.Thanima Marbles et al regarding recovery of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri.Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-10-29
Duration
approximately-7 years 8 months
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Rajan.M, is suing the defendants, including M/s.Thanima Marbles, for recovery of money based on dishonored cheques. The defendants claimed that the case is barred by law of limitation as the suit was filed after the limitation period.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as barred by the law of limitation. The plaintiff was found to have filed the suit after the prescribed period, with no acknowledgment from the defendants on the debts owed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as barred by the law of limitation. The plaintiff was found to have filed the suit after the prescribed period, with no acknowledgment from the defendants on the debts owed.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was barred by limitation, as per the provisions of the Limitation Act.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has no case that the alleged debts covered by Ext.A1, A5, A7 and A9 cheques were duly acknowledged by the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajan.M
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s.Thanima Marbles
Relation
represented by partners
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jose Raj
Party Age
51
Relation
Partner of M/s.Thanima Marbles
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shajilal
Party Age
53
Relation
Partner of M/s.Thanima Marbles
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque bearing No.102195, CBS SC remittance schedule cum voucher dated 08/09/2010, Pay-in-slip for cash, Cheque dishonour memo, Cheque bearing No.106811, Pay-in-slip for cash, Cheque bearing No.106861, Pay-in-slip for cash, Cheque bearing No.126217, Pay-in-slip for cash, Copy of Advocate’s notice, Acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sureshbabu.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vettoor S.Prakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs.1,37,886/- with interest.
Evidence:
this suit filed on 05/03/2018 beyond the period of limitation is clearly barred by law.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued for the payment amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Voucher
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This voucher relates to the financial transaction between the plaintiff and defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Pay-in Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the financial claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cheque Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo indicates that the cheque was dishonoured for 'Exceeds arrangements'.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued for the payment amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Pay-in Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the financial claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued for the payment amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Pay-in Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the financial claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued for the payment amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Pay-in Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the financial claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Advocate's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice serves as communication regarding the debt owed.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card acknowledges receipt of the Advocate's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Rajan.M vs M/s.Thanima Marbles et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Rajan.M vs M/s.Thanima Marbles et al regarding recovery of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 03/05/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Mohammed Yousuf vs Fakrudeen Bava regarding realization of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between C.M.Iype et al vs C.M.Jacob regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.Madhusoodanan vs Smt.S.Chandrika Devi regarding recovery of money
Additional Munsiff-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Buhuleyan V.V vs Shaji P.S regarding loan recovery
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Nambiattududy Modern Rice Mill et al vs M/s. Asif Stores et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won