Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1127/2019

Case between Abdul Latheef vs A.N. Naushad et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-6 years 8 months
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Latheef is the plaintiff in this suit against A.N. Naushad and Saleena Beevi, who are defendants, for the recovery of Rs.2 lakhs loaned for business purposes. The defendants borrowed the amount but failed to repay, leading to this legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, Abdul Latheef, and ordered the defendants to pay Rs.2 lakhs with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay Rs.2,00,000 with interest at 18% per annum and future interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, Abdul Latheef, and ordered the defendants to pay Rs.2 lakhs with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants failed to provide convincing evidence countering the plaintiff's claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The defendant neither has a case that he had not put his signature in Ext.A2 cheque nor that it was not voluntarily given.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendants are directed to pay 2,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from 26/01/2019 till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Latheef
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.N. Naushad
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saleena Beevi
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext.A1: Passbook, Ext.A2: Cheque No. 426556, Ext.A3: Return Memo, Ext.A4: Reply Notice, Ext.A5: Legal Notice, Ext.A6: Postal receipt, Ext.A7: Acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kamaleswaram. S. Manikantan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri . A.A. Hakkim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the defendants.
Evidence:
Therefore, I find that plaintiff is entitled for realisation of 2,00,000/- from the defendant with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from 26/01/2019 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Therefore, I hold a view that plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Passbook
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original passbook is marked as Ext.A1 to show the account in which the cheque would have been deposited.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original cheque No.426556 drawn on State Bank of India dated 15/06/2019 is marked as Ext.A2 towards the legally enforceable debt.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The return memo report is marked as Ext.A3 indicating that the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds in the defendant's account.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ext.A4 is the reply notice to the legal notice issued to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ext.A5 is the legal notice issued by the plaintiff demanding repayment of the owed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt for the legal notice sent to the defendant is marked as Ext.A6.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment card for the delivery of the legal notice is marked as Ext.A7.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Abdul Latheef vs A.N. Naushad et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Latheef vs A.N. Naushad et al regarding recovery of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 01/26/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K. Shakeela vs S. Sajan regarding recovery of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.Madhusoodanan vs Smt.S.Chandrika Devi regarding recovery of money
Additional Munsiff-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shajikumar.B vs Sreekumar regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Sreekantan Nair vs R.Rekha @ Rekha Satheesan et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Veena Raj vs Rajeev.S.R regarding realisation of money.
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won