Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.807/2024

Case between Valliappa Ganesh.M vs S N Ajith Kumar et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt.Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-08-22
Duration
Case Code No.
807
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Valliappa Ganesh.M is the plaintiff seeking compensation for damages from S N Ajith Kumar and the Managing Director of KSRTC. The case involves allegations of defamatory statements that caused the plaintiff mental agony and damage to his reputation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by Valliappa Ganesh.M was dismissed by the court. The court found that there was no prima facie case established against the defendants, and thus the claims of defamation were not substantiated.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by Valliappa Ganesh.M was dismissed by the court. The court found that there was no prima facie case established against the defendants, and thus the claims of defamation were not substantiated.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that no credible evidence was presented to support the claims of defamation or mental agony.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that no credible evidence was presented to support the claims of defamation or mental agony.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has not shown prima facie case. The petition did not disclose, what was the defamatory statement published against the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Valliappa Ganesh.M
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S N Ajith Kumar
Party Age
56
Relation
null
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Managing Director, KSRTC
Relation
null
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Satheesh Babu.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.R. Vidhayadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner claimed Rs.10,00,000/- for damages sustained due to the preparation of false and defamatory reports.
Evidence:
From the aforesaid discussions, this court is of the view that the petition is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Defamation
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Thara Kumari.S et al vs Premalatha.S.Nair et al regarding compromise agreement
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cindrella Darthalis vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.R. Amritha vs State of Kerala, The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Vilapil Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissing for default.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Noorjahan vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.Sreejith.IPS vs K.M.Shajahan regarding damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won