Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.137/2023

Case between Unnikrishnan.K. vs Krishnakumar regarding Interim Injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-10-22
Duration
Case Code No.
137
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Unnikrishnan.K., who is seeking an interim injunction to prevent Krishnakumar from trespassing onto his property. The plaintiff claims that a re-survey reduced his land area and the defendant is threatening to construct a boundary wall.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the interim injunction, restraining the defendant and their associates from trespassing onto the plaintiff's property or constructing any boundaries until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction against the defendant from trespassing into the property and making construction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the interim injunction, restraining the defendant and their associates from trespassing onto the plaintiff's property or constructing any boundaries until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff has a prima facie right over the property and there was a reasonable apprehension of trespass.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff has a prima facie right over the property and there was a reasonable apprehension of trespass.
Supporting Evidence
The court observed that there is a dispute regarding the boundaries of the properties and it is necessary to protect the subject matter of the suit from illegal encroachment.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: The defendants and their henchmen are restrained from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and from making construction in it or at its southern boundary or disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint A schedule property, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Unnikrishnan.K.
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.Bindukumari
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnakumar
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Authorization Letter, Settlement Deed No.205/10.2005, Settlement Deed No.314/03.1978, Tax Receipt, Statement, Sketch
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.Gopinathan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.Subramonian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court granted an injunction to prevent the defendant from trespassing and making constructions on the plaintiff's property.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: The defendants and their henchmen are restrained from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and from making construction in it or at its southern boundary or disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint A schedule property, until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Authorisation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document grants authority to the plaintiff's wife to file the suit and petition.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deed establishes the plaintiff's rights to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deed provides further context to the property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt evidences the payment of property tax related to the disputed property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement contains additional information regarding the plaintiff's position.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This sketch illustrates the layout of the properties in question.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report is referred to in assessing the situation regarding the property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 01/05/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sangeetha et al vs Girija Ity et al regarding impleading additional defendants.
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N. Krishnankutty vs Sunil.S regarding securing property
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Murali kumar vs Subramaya pillai et al regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreekumari.K vs Thulasi et al regarding temporary injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini.A vs Shiju.A regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won