Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.1151/2025

Case between N. Krishnankutty vs Sunil.S regarding securing property

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-07-02
Duration
Case Code No.
1151
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

N. Krishnankutty, the plaintiff, is seeking a security order concerning the scheduled property from the defendant, Sunil.S. The court found that there is a prima facie case that necessitates the attachment of the property to prevent its transfer.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered that the scheduled property be conditionally attached until further orders as there is a risk of it being transferred.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional attachment of scheduled property
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the scheduled property be conditionally attached until further orders as there is a risk of it being transferred.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated a prima facie case and the necessity to secure the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner demonstrated a prima facie case and the necessity to secure the property.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner has got a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

If the petition is not allowed, there will be chance to transfer the petition schedule property, which will defeat the decree that may be passed in favour of the petitioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N. Krishnankutty
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunil.S
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.K. Prasanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Saiju. P.G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Security to be furnished for Rs. 5,36,000/- or to show cause why security should not be furnished.
Evidence:
If the petition is not allowed, there will be chance to transfer the petition schedule property, which will defeat the decree that may be passed in favour of the petitioner.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Scheduled property is conditionally attached until further orders.
Evidence:
In the meantime, the scheduled property is conditionally attached until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ayshabeevi vs Subaida Beevi et al regarding examination of witness
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sangeetha et al vs Girija Ity et al regarding impleading additional defendants.
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Murali kumar vs Subramaya pillai et al regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreekumari.K vs Thulasi et al regarding temporary injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini.A vs Shiju.A regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won