Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.991/2017

Case between Ayshabeevi vs Subaida Beevi et al regarding examination of witness

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration
approximately-8 years
Case Code No.
991
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ayshabeevi is the petitioner seeking to examine her husband in a civil suit. The defendants argue that the plaintiff should present her case herself and that her husband is not an aggrieved person.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to permit the examination of the petitioner's husband as a witness.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition to permit the examination of the petitioner's husband as a witness.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioner's husband is a competent witness under the Indian Evidence Act.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the petitioner's husband is a competent witness under the Indian Evidence Act.
Supporting Evidence
Relying on the said decision, this court is of the view that the petitioner is liable to be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the petitioner is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayshabeevi
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subaida Beevi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asanarupilla
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nazeema beevi
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.P. Jayachandran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. R.Shafeek
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is allowed to examine her husband as a witness.
Evidence:
Relying on the afore said decision this court is of the view that the petitioner is liable to be allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sangeetha et al vs Girija Ity et al regarding impleading additional defendants.
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N. Krishnankutty vs Sunil.S regarding securing property
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Murali kumar vs Subramaya pillai et al regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreekumari.K vs Thulasi et al regarding temporary injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini.A vs Shiju.A regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won