Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.1021/2025

Case between Sreekumari.K vs Thulasi et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
Case Code No.
1021
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sreekumari.K is the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against the defendants, Thulasi and Sanhya, from carrying out construction activities. The court has found a prima facie case for granting the injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction to Sreekumari.K restraining the defendants from conducting construction activities.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining defendants from construction activities
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to Sreekumari.K restraining the defendants from conducting construction activities.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that issuing a notice would defeat the purpose of the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that issuing a notice would defeat the purpose of the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this IA will defeat the purpose of injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendants from doing any construction activities in the B schedule boundary wall, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreekumari.K
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o Late Rajachandran Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thulasi
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o Late Sundersan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanhya
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o Thulasi
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.N. Gopalakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendants from doing any construction activities in the B schedule boundary wall, until further orders.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this IA will defeat the purpose of injunction. Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendants from doing any construction activities in the B schedule boundary wall, until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ayshabeevi vs Subaida Beevi et al regarding examination of witness
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sangeetha et al vs Girija Ity et al regarding impleading additional defendants.
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N. Krishnankutty vs Sunil.S regarding securing property
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Murali kumar vs Subramaya pillai et al regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini.A vs Shiju.A regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won