Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.435/2024

Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s. Diamond 24x7 regarding realization of money.

Court
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II
Judge
Smt.ANJALI. P
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
approximately-2 years 1 month
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Union Bank of India, has filed a suit against the defendants, M/s. Diamond 24x7 and its proprietor, for the realization of a cash credit facility amounting to Rs. 4,50,000. The defendants defaulted on the repayment despite several demands, leading to this litigation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court directed the defendants to pay Rs.4,66,148.23 to the plaintiff, along with interest and costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.4,66,148.23 with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court directed the defendants to pay Rs.4,66,148.23 to the plaintiff, along with interest and costs of the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence of the defendant's failure to repay the loan.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence of the defendant's failure to repay the loan.
Supporting Evidence
The case of the plaintiff is proved by the unchallenged oral testimony of the PW1 and the exhibits A1 to A8 documents produced by him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1. The defendant is hereby directed to pay Rs.4,66,148.23 to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 9 per cent from date of suit till date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6 per cent from the date of decree till date of realization. 2. The defendants shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
Rep by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Diamond 24x7
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salih Theruvoth Ahammed Unni
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand Promissory Note executed by the defendant, Hypothecation Agreement executed by the defendant, Letter of undertaking not to alienate Hypothecated goods, Recall notice, Acknowledgement Card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.S.Rajagopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to pay the principal amount with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is hereby directed to pay Rs.4,66,148.23/- (Rupees four lakhs sixty six thousand one hundred and forty eight and twenty three paise only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 9 percent from date of suit till date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6 percent from the date of decree till date of realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants ordered to pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant as a formal agreement to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant to secure the loan with hypothecated goods.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement by the defendant not to alienate hypothecated goods.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Recall Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the plaintiff to inform the defendant of the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgement of receipt of the notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Unclaimed Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned notice indicating non-receipt by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the account activities during the specified period.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified copy of statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows subsequent account activities following the initial statement.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s. Diamond 24x7 regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s. Diamond 24x7 regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 07/27/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Cut Man Gents Beauty Parlour et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Bank et al vs M/s. A J Advisory Services et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peruvayal Branch vs Sri.Mohanan.K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Samson @ Louis Samsom regarding loan repayment
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr Fahad Rahman P P et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won