Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.678 /2016

Case between Surendran et al vs Syamalakumari et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-02-12
Duration
Case Code No.
678
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Surendran and others against defendants Syamalakumari and others. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' absence and their failure to provide evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their failure to present evidence. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their failure to present evidence. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Surendran
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S. Shinjith
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S. Rijith
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Syamalakumari
Party Age
84
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C. Dinil Chandran
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Premakumari
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R. Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun A.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.S. Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Kesavankutty Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiffs are neither present nor ready to adduce evidence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between K. Rajan et al vs S.P. Jayaprakash et al regarding dismissal for default
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sukumari B.S vs Pradeep et al regarding dismissal of the suit
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sulaikha Beevi et al vs Thara.L et al regarding status quo as per commission report
Court of Additional Munsiff- III
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sainulabdeen Thahir vs Althaf.A regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jaganathan.K vs Sudhavathi et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Original Suit Defendant Won