Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.583/2025

Case between Sulaikha Beevi et al vs Thara.L et al regarding status quo as per commission report

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff- III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Sulaikha Beevi, Abraham M.Abraham, and Thomas Chandy seeking a relief regarding the status quo based on a commission report. The defendants, Thara.L, Prasannan, and Babu, were called absent during the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decided to allow the status quo as per the commission report, given the absence of the defendants even after due service of summons.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Status quo as per commission report
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decided to allow the status quo as per the commission report, given the absence of the defendants even after due service of summons.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court allowed the status quo based on the commission report.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court allowed the status quo based on the commission report.
Supporting Evidence
The court allowed the status quo based on the commission report.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence as defendant is called absent even after due service of summons and no objection seen filed, I am inclined to allow status quo as per commission report in the interest of justice.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sulaikha Beevi
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abraham M.Abraham
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thomas Chandy
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thara.L
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasannan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.R.Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Krishnakumar.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Status quo as per commission report.
Evidence:
I am inclined to allow status quo as per commission report in the interest of justice.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referenced the commission report while allowing status quo in the interest of justice.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sulaikha Beevi et al vs Thara.L et al regarding status quo as per commission report
Case Code Year
Case between Sulaikha Beevi et al vs Thara.L et al regarding status quo as per commission report

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between K. Somanandan vs Dr. G.Pavithran regarding the abatement of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Cricket Association (KCA) vs Eternal Sports Private Limited regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sainulabdeen Thahir vs Althaf.A regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Syamalakumari et al regarding dismissal for default
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jaganathan.K vs Sudhavathi et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Original Suit Defendant Won