Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1908/2023

Case between K. Somanandan vs Dr. G.Pavithran regarding the abatement of suit

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-06-25
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 06/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K. Somanandan was the plaintiff, and Dr. G.Pavithran was the defendant in this case. The court determined that the suit abated due to the plaintiff's death and failure to implead legal heirs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was abated due to the death of the plaintiff and the absence of legal heirs to continue the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was abated due to the death of the plaintiff and the absence of legal heirs to continue the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's suit was abated as no steps were taken to implead the legal heirs after the plaintiff's death.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's suit was abated as no steps were taken to implead the legal heirs after the plaintiff's death.
Supporting Evidence
The court determined that the plaintiff was no more and no steps were taken to implead legal heirs.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit stands abated Pronounced in open court on this the 25th day of June 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. Somanandan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. G.Pavithran
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Deepu.U.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Arunjith.A.L.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Priyanka.U.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Lekshmi.S.R.Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Radhakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Dinesh.A.G.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Joseph.K.O.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit stands abated due to the plaintiff no longer being available.
Evidence:
Plaintiff represented. Learned counsel for plaintiff submitted plaintiff no more. No steps taken to implead Legal heirs of deceased plaintiff. Hence suit stands abated

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K. Somanandan vs Dr. G.Pavithran regarding the abatement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between K. Somanandan vs Dr. G.Pavithran regarding the abatement of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 06/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Cricket Association (KCA) vs Eternal Sports Private Limited regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sulaikha Beevi et al vs Thara.L et al regarding status quo as per commission report
Court of Additional Munsiff- III
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sainulabdeen Thahir vs Althaf.A regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Syamalakumari et al regarding dismissal for default
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jaganathan.K vs Sudhavathi et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Original Suit Defendant Won