Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1660/2022

Case between K. Rajan et al vs S.P. Jayaprakash et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-10-07
Duration
Case Code No.
1660
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K. Rajan and T.V. Poul, filed a suit against the defendants S.P. Jayaprakash, Ganeshkumar N.V, N. Sreekumar, and R. Sureshkumar. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiffs were absent, and the suit was dismissed for default due to their lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiffs were absent, and the suit was dismissed for default due to their lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. Rajan
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.V. Poul
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.P. Jayaprakash
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ganeshkumar N.V
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N. Sreekumar
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R. Sureshkumar
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N.C. Priyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. L. Manojkumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sreebhadran. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Chandrasekharan Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Govind V.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Shabna. Rahim
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Jerees.J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth N.L
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented. The suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sukumari B.S vs Pradeep et al regarding dismissal of the suit
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sulaikha Beevi et al vs Thara.L et al regarding status quo as per commission report
Court of Additional Munsiff- III
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sainulabdeen Thahir vs Althaf.A regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Syamalakumari et al regarding dismissal for default
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jaganathan.K vs Sudhavathi et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Original Suit Defendant Won