Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 403/2014

Case between Sudha et al vs P.J. Sanjay regarding counter claim

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration
Case Code No.
403
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the Counter-claim made by P.J. Sanjay against Sudha and others. The court permitted the plaintiff to withdraw the counter claim with liberty to file a fresh suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, and the plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the counter claim with liberty to file a fresh suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, and the plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the counter claim with liberty to file a fresh suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it appropriate to allow the withdrawal of the counter-claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found it appropriate to allow the withdrawal of the counter-claim.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the materials this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the petition is allowed and the plaintiff/ counter claim plaintiff/ D7 is permitted to withdraw the counter claim with liberty to file fresh suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudha
Party Age
67
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sushamma
Party Age
64
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sugandi
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sukesan
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sujatha
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.J. Sanjay
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. S. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Jayakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Thattathumala. S. Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed and the plaintiff/counter claim plaintiff/D7 is permitted to withdraw the counter claim with liberty to file fresh suit.
Evidence:
After considering the materials this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2014

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sarada vs Deepthi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Counter Claim Defendant Won
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Sunilkumar K.K. et al regarding property partition
THE MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Soorya et al vs Sooraj regarding metes and bounds partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Swarnavalli et al vs Vishwaguptan et al regarding final decree application
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Lissy vs Lilly et al regarding final decree application
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won