Case Summary
This case involves Subash Chandran.S and Rajeev.R as plaintiffs and Gopakumar and Smitha BC as defendants. The plaintiffs sought an injunction against the defendants to prevent obstruction of their access to a specific way.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs' usage of C schedule way.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to restrain the defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs' usage of the specified way.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case and delaying the injunction would defeat its purpose.
The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case and delaying the injunction would defeat its purpose.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case and delaying the injunction would defeat its purpose.
The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case and delaying the injunction would defeat its purpose.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from obstructing the peaceful usage of C schedule way by the plaintiffs, until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subash Chandran.S
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajeev.R
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopakumar
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smitha BC
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vimal Chandran.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.B.Jayachandran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from obstructing the peaceful usage of C schedule way by the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of assessing the prima facie case.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered the plaint to evaluate the injunction request.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025