Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.917/2025

Case between Sajikumar vs Ramani et al regarding injunction application.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-06-28
Duration
Case Code No.
917
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Sajikumar claims he is the absolute owner of a property based on a family arrangement with his father who purchased the property. The defendants, Ramani and her children, contest this claim, asserting their legal ownership through a will and other documents.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition for injunction, ruling that he did not demonstrate a prima facie case for the relief sought.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition for injunction, ruling that he did not demonstrate a prima facie case for the relief sought.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants established their ownership of the property through title documents, which the plaintiff could not refute.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has to show prima facie right in favour of him and such right has to be infringed by the respondents. It is to be noted that there is no documentary evidence produced by the petitioner to support his right over the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajikumar
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramani
Party Age
67
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sibi
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saji
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Simi Chandran
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Attested copy of title deed of the plaint schedule property, Copy of death certificate, Copy of the petition lodged before the police station
Defendants Documents
Original sale deed, Original title deed of scheduled property, Will deed, Settlement deed

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Kulathoor Rahul. L.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.S. Manish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought an injunction to prevent the respondents from interfering with the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence, this court is of the view that the petitioner is not entitled for the discretionary relief of injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Title deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Attested copy of title deed of the plaint schedule property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of death certificate
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Police Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the petition lodged before the police station
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original sale deed
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Title deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original title deed of scheduled property
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Will deed showing property allocation
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Another will deed
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Settlement deed
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Settlement deed
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Death certificate
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Death certificate
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Tax receipt
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type: Rent Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Rent deed
Reference:
Ext.B10
Document Type: Case Summary
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Case summary and discharge sheet
Reference:
Ext.B11
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice
Reference:
Ext.B12
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice
Reference:
Ext.B13
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Tax receipt
Reference:
Ext.B14
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Photograph
Reference:
Ext.B15

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Family arrangement
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Subash Chandran.S et al vs Gopakumar et al regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A.M.Shanavas vs A.Nizarudeen, Venugopal Nair regarding temporary injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayasree.V vs Sreekumar.S.V regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunilkumar. K.V vs Rajeev kumar et al regarding temporary injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayasree C.R vs Rajendran.C.V regarding Mandatory Injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won