Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.1026/2025

Case between A.M.Shanavas vs A.Nizarudeen, Venugopal Nair regarding temporary injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
Case Code No.
1026
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A.M.Shanavas filed a petition against A.Nizarudeen and Venugopal Nair regarding a temporary injunction. The court granted an injunction to prevent unauthorized constructions affecting access to the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction to the plaintiff against the defendants regarding unauthorized constructions obstructing access to the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the defendants from unauthorized constructions.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to the plaintiff against the defendants regarding unauthorized constructions obstructing access to the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was made out and delay in notice issuance would defeat the injunction purpose.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the purpose of injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the 1st counter petitioner/1st defendant and his henchmen from putting up any unauthorized constructions obstructing the ingress and egress to the plaint B schedule property, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.M.Shanavas
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.Nizarudeen
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Venugopal Nair
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.P.Jayaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction is granted restraining the 1st counter petitioner and his henchmen from putting up any unauthorized constructions obstructing the ingress and egress to the plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the 1st counter petitioner/1st defendant and his henchmen from putting up any unauthorized constructions obstructing the ingress and egress to the plaint B schedule property, until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of the hearing.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Subash Chandran.S et al vs Gopakumar et al regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayasree.V vs Sreekumar.S.V regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunilkumar. K.V vs Rajeev kumar et al regarding temporary injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajikumar vs Ramani et al regarding injunction application.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Jayasree C.R vs Rajendran.C.V regarding Mandatory Injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won